lachocolatiere.com
|
My elections Notasinc.com Nyc-it.com Orderatease.com Parkway village Portablesymas.com Pre columbian cultures Pre columbian handicrafts Quickchai.com |
| lachocolatiere.com | Chibchas | Norte Chico e Inca Nazca culture | Chavín civilization | The Moche civilization | Inca Empire | Population history of American indigenous peoples | Pre-Columbian Cultures |
Population history of American indigenous peoples
| There were millions of Indians, who had arrived from Asia, living in the Americas when Christopher Columbus arrived in 1492. Columbus' voyage to what Europeans called the "New World" set the stage for the later European colonization of the Americas, with millions of emigrants (willing and unwilling) from the "Old World" eventually resettling in the Americas. While the population of Old World peoples in the Americas steadily grew in the centuries after Columbus, the population of the American indigenous peoples plummeted. The extent and causes of this population decline have long been the subject of controversy and debate, which became particularly widespread in 1992 during the 500th anniversary of Columbus' famous voyage, with a number of people claiming that the Indians living in the Americas had been the victims of Spanish genocide. | |
|
Estimates of how many people were living in the Americas when
Columbus arrived have varied tremendously; in the 20th century
scholarly estimates ranged from a low of 8.4 million to a high of
112.5 million persons. Given the fragmentary nature of the evidence,
precise pre-Columbian population figures are impossible to obtain;
estimates are often produced by extrapolation from comparatively
small bits of data. In 1976, geographer William Denevan used these
various estimates to derive a "consensus count" of about 54 million
people, although some recent estimates are lower than that. Historian David Henige, representing a self-described "minority opinion", has argued that many population figures are the result of arbitrary formulas selectively applied to numbers from unreliable historical sources, a deficiency he sees as being unrecognized by several contributors to the field. He believes there is not enough solid evidence to produce population numbers that have any real meaning, and characterizes the modern trend of high estimates as "pseudo-scientific number-crunching." Henige does not advocate a low population estimate; rather, he argues that the scanty and unreliable nature of the evidence renders broad estimates suspect, and that "high counters" (as he calls them) have been particularly flagrant in their misuse of sources. Although Henige's criticisms are directed against some specific instances, other studies do generally acknowledge the inherent difficulties in producing reliable statistics given the almost complete lack of any hard data for the period in question. This population debate has often had ideological underpinnings. Low estimates were sometimes reflective of European notions of their own cultural and racial superiority, as historian Francis Jennings has argued: "Scholarly wisdom long held that Indians were so inferior in mind and works that they could not possibly have created or sustained large populations." At the other end of the spectrum, some have argued that contemporary estimates of a high pre-Columbian indigenous population are rooted in a bias against aspects of Western civilization and/or Christianity. Robert Royal writes that "estimates of pre-Columbian population figures have become heavily politicized with scholars who are particularly critical of Europe often favoring wildly higher figures." Since civilizations rose and fell in the Americas before Columbus arrived, the indigenous population in 1492 was not necessarily at a high point, and may have already been in decline. Indigenous populations in most areas of the Americas reached a low point by the early twentieth century, and in a number of cases started to climb again. The earliest European immigrants offered two principal explanations for the population decline of the American natives. The first was the brutal practices of the Spanish conquistadors, as recorded by the Spanish themselves, most notably by the Dominican friar Bartolomé de Las Casas, whose writings vividly depict atrocities committed on the natives by the Spanish. The second explanation was religious: God had removed the natives as part of His divine plan in order to make way for a new Christian civilization. Many natives of the Americas also understood their troubles in terms of religious or supernatural causes. Scholars now believe that, among the various contributing factors, epidemic disease was the overwhelming cause of the population decline of the American natives. Disease began to kill immense numbers of indigenous Americans soon after Europeans and Africans began to arrive in the New World, bringing with them the infectious diseases of the Old World. One reason this death toll was overlooked (or downplayed) for so long is that disease, according to the widely held theory, raced ahead of European immigration in many areas, thus often killing off a sizable portion of the population before European observations (and thus written records) were made. Many European immigrants who arrived after the epidemics had already killed massive numbers of American natives assumed that the natives had always been few in number. The scope of the epidemics over the years was enormous, killing millions of people—in excess of 90% of the population in the hardest hit areas—and creating "the greatest human catastrophe in history, far exceeding even the disaster of the Black Death of medieval Europe." The most devastating disease was smallpox, but other deadly diseases included typhus, measles, influenza, bubonic plague, mumps, yellow fever, and whooping cough. The Americas also had endemic diseases, perhaps including a type of syphilis, which soon became rampant in the Old World. (This transfer of disease between the Old and New Worlds was part of the phenomenon known as the "Columbian Exchange.") But the diseases brought to the New World proved to be exceptionally deadly. The epidemics had very different effects in different parts of the Americas. The most vulnerable groups were those with a relatively small population. Many island based groups were utterly annihilated. The Caribs and Arawaks of the Caribbean nearly ceased to exist, as did the Beothuks of Newfoundland. While disease ranged swiftly through the densely populated empires of Mesoamerica, the more scattered populations of North America saw a slower spread. |
|
Nofeerentals.com: No fee rental apartments ,funrished apt rental in Chelsea NYC
Nofeerentals.com no fee rental apartments in Chelsea New York NY studio, furnished, unfurnished, Chelsea rental apts
http://www.nofeerentals.com/new-york/manhattan/chelsea.asp
Notasinc.com Embossed Ceramic Paintings, unique and exclusive lovely hand-painted pieces
Ceramic Paintings, unique and exclusive lovely hand-painted landscapes and scenes pieces, made over embossed ceramic handcrafted by Colombian artists
http://www.notasinc.com/ceramic_paintings.htm
Lansend.com: Microsoft Certified Computer consultants in New York, NY
Microsoft Certified Computer consultants providing computer and network consulting services in New York ,NY Manhattan Queens, Lan Wan Networking VPN.
http://www.lansend.com
Benefits of Drinking Tea
There are lots of reasons I enjoy a hot cup of tea: I love the aroma of various
flavors of tea; holding onto a hot tea mug warms my hands on a cold winter ...
http://www.quiktea.com/catalog/Benefits_of_Drinking_Tea-14-1.html
| lachocolatiere.com | Chibchas | Norte Chico e Inca Nazca culture | Chavín civilization | The Moche civilization | Inca Empire | Population history of American indigenous peoples | Pre-Columbian Cultures |